danger/LLM_patch
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

init commit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
danger
2024-10-15 10:49:25 +08:00
parent 96bd52bfcc
commit 8dd7505095
15 changed files with 1105 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
output/dprintf_extract/patch_dprintf.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
[
{
"file_path": "/root/LLM_prompt/output//dprintf_extract/patch_dprintf.json",
"vul_info": " there is a dprintf format string vulnerability in the echo_handler function. The vulnerability lies in the line `dprintf(sock, buffer)`, where the buffer is being passed as the format string to the dprintf function without proper formatting. This can potentially lead to a format string vulnerability."
},
{
"file_path": "dprintf_extract.c",
"vul_info": " there is a dprintf format string vulnerability in the echo_handler function. The vulnerability lies in the line `dprintf(sock, buffer)`, where the buffer is being passed as the format string to dprintf without proper formatting. This can potentially lead to a format string vulnerability."
},
{
"file_path": "dprintf_extract.c",
"vul_info": " there is a dprintf format string vulnerability in the echo_handler function. The vulnerability lies in the line `dprintf(sock, buffer)`, where the buffer is passed as the format string to the dprintf function without proper formatting. This can potentially lead to a format string vulnerability."
},
{
"file_path": "dprintf_extract.c",
"vul_info": " there is a dprintf format string vulnerability in the echo_handler function. The vulnerability lies in the line `dprintf(sock, buffer)`, where the buffer is being passed as the format string to dprintf without proper formatting. This can potentially lead to a format string vulnerability."
},
{
"file_path": "dprintf_extract.c",
"vul_info": " there is a dprintf format string vulnerability in the echo_handler function. The vulnerability lies in the line `dprintf(sock, buffer)`, where the buffer is directly passed as the format string to the dprintf function without proper formatting. This can potentially lead to a format string vulnerability."
},
{
"file_path": "dprintf_extract.c",
"vul_info": " there is a dprintf format string vulnerability in the echo_handler function. The vulnerability lies in the line `dprintf(sock, buffer)`, where the buffer is passed as the format string to the dprintf function without proper formatting. This can lead to a format string vulnerability, allowing an attacker to potentially read or write arbitrary memory locations."
}
]

14
output/dprintf_extract/patch_recv.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
[
{
"file_name": "dprintf_extract.c",
"vul_info": " reason: The recv function in the echo_handler function does not check the size of the buffer before writing data to it. The buffer size is 256 bytes, but the recv function is writing up to 0x100 bytes (256 bytes) to the buffer, which can lead to a buffer overflow vulnerability.",
"fix_size": 248,
"patch_info": "In the echo_handler function, the buffer size is 256 bytes, but only 248 bytes are being used for the recv function (starting from buffer[8]). This leaves 8 bytes unused, which could potentially lead to a buffer overflow if the recv function receives more than 248 bytes of data. To ensure the program works safely, the recv function should be prepared to receive a maximum of 248 bytes of data."
},
{
"file_name": "dprintf_extract.c",
"vul_info": " reason: The recv function in the echo_handler function does not check the size of the buffer before writing data to it. This can lead to a buffer overflow vulnerability if the data received is larger than the size of the buffer (256 bytes). An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to overwrite memory beyond the buffer and execute arbitrary code.",
"fix_size": 248,
"patch_info": "In the echo_handler function, the buffer size is 256 bytes. However, only 248 bytes are being used for the recv function (buffer[8] to buffer[255]). This leaves 8 bytes at the beginning of the buffer unused, which could potentially lead to a buffer overflow if the recv function receives more than 248 bytes of data."
}
]